-
Content Count
6,688 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
23
Gurowake last won the day on December 11 2024
Gurowake had the most liked content!
Community Reputation
4,098 ExcellentAbout Gurowake
-
Rank
Supporting Spinal Tool
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Detroit area
-
Interests
Breathing, Eating, Sleeping.
Recent Profile Visitors
11,502 profile views
-
So we might (not likely given the difference in rank, but reasonably possible) see Mita vs. Mitakeumi next basho.
-
It's possible that one of the measures of net income is something like EBITDA or Free Cash Flow that's more cash-basis, while the other is accrual-basis accounting income. I don't know enough Japanese to be able to read financial statements, but I suspect that the lower number is likely to be accounting income, as they would have a lot of depreciation, amortization, and accrual of rikishi retirement benefits some which are not part of EBITDA or FCF but would be part of accounting income.
-
Well, he is. You don't stop being a Ozeki when you become a Yokozuna. And that link does say Yokozuna for rank now - perhaps you have a cached version of the page.
-
My memory is that only Sadanohana had a yusho from such a low rank in that time period.
-
Promotion/Demotion and Yūshō Discussion Haru 2025
Gurowake replied to Reonito's topic in Honbasho Talk
Doesn't seem likely to me. I think if Takayasu lost it would be closer, but given that they don't seem to have as much deference to Komusubi when it comes to Sekiwake promotion compared to maegashira as they might once have, and that Takayasu actually had a harder schedule by some metrics, I personally have little doubt Takayasu gets it. But what do I know anymore? -
Promotion/Demotion and Yūshō Discussion Haru 2025
Gurowake replied to Reonito's topic in Honbasho Talk
Kusano(14-1 J14w) J1 Hidenoumi(10-5 J6w) Mitakeumi(6-9 M17e) J2 Fujiseiun(9-6 J5w) Takarafuji(3-12 M12e) J3 Shirokuma(5-10 M17w) Hakuyozan(9-6 J8w) J4 Wakaikari(8-7 J9e) Kagayaki(4-11 J1w) J5 Hitoshi(9-6 J12e) Daiseizan(8-7 J10e) J6 Nishikifuji(0-2 M13e) Shimanoumi(8-7 J10w) J7 Tomokaze(7-8 J7e) Tsurugisho(8-7 J11e) J8 Kotoeiho(7-8 J7w) Shiden(4-11 J4e) J9 Oshoumi(4-7 J4w) Tohakuryu(7-8 J9w) J10 Hatsuyama(8-7 J13e) Kazekeno(8-7 J13w) J11 Mitoryu(4-11 J6e) Wakanosho(7-8 J11w) J12 Nabatame(3-8 J5e) Miyagi(4-3 Ms1e) J13 Daiamami(4-3 Ms2e) Mita(5-2 Ms4w) J14 Mudoho(4-3 Ms3w) Last basho Shirokuma was level with Tamashoho if you consider there to be one full rank extra space between divisions, so it made sense he got promoted, though less sense that he was put over Tokihayate except for what seems like a general desire now of dropping 7-8s at least one place only a few basho after leaving 6-9s with no demotion. This basho we have Kusano and Hidenoumi level with Asakoryu and Nishikigi by the numbers if you don't add some extra space between the divisions. If this was Juryo<>Makushita, we'd see such a tie go to the promotees (in just about the only way in which they favor Makushita promotees), but will they do the same with Makuuchi<>Juryo? I'm not really sure what to do with the J7-J8 area. We have 7-8s that by the numbers could keep their rank, but there are rikishi reasonably close that could make them get at least a one-spot demotion. I also felt Tsurugisho over Tomokaze was a bit too far to go given the latter already had a one-spot demotion, but at the same time keeping the two 7-8s together splitting the 8-7s seemed stupid, so I went with what's shown. -
Promotion/Demotion and Yūshō Discussion Haru 2025
Gurowake replied to Reonito's topic in Honbasho Talk
Daieisho was getting an extra sanyaku spot no matter what rank he was put at; the lower sanyaku all had KKs. Pretty much everyone assumed it was going to be Sekiwake due to the last 13-2 at M1, but that it was Komusubi didn't change the number of sanyaku, so it really didn't affect scores any more than just getting him wrong. -
A 39-year-old returning from Juryo after over a year there scoring a bare KK might be less impressive in the overall scheme of things, but it's surely about as unexpected.
-
Full sansho speculation: Shukun-sho conditional on Yusho for all maegashira in contention Gino-sho to Takayasu Kanto-sho to Aonishiki Kanto-sho to Tamawashi if he wins
-
As mentioned last basho, Kyokutenho got one for getting 10 wins at basically the same age as Tamawashi was last basho. This basho he's equaled his 9 win total from last basho, is in the top half of the division, and beat a Komusubi. Given that he was kinda sorta in the yusho race too (losing to guys who are still in it the last couple days), I would vote to give a sansho to Tamawashi unconditionally.
-
I was expecting to see a Kizenryu-uwatenage-level percentage on that guy in the top, but it's "only" around 30% or his wins, not 48% for Kizenryu, though that's probably simply because uwatenage is generally more common anyway. That guy's Katatsukashi rate was 40 times the base rate, while Kizenryu's uwatenage rate was "only" 9.25 times. Midorifuji's rate for Katatsukashi is around 25 times the base rate.
-
I didn't mean for it to become a topic of conversation. I initially referenced an old suggestion that I had, and I've been trying to minimally answer questions about it. I didn't intend to open this can of worms, only to respond to what people were asking. You're being really harsh here for a reason I can't really understand. You could have made all these points in a much more constructive way. I acknowledge most of your points, but I don't really want to argue about it. While I have put some work into thinking about it, it's not like I've declared it as an absolutely air tight way to improve the promotions to Juryo. I'm sorry I ever brought it up here, and I'll be sure to never mention it again seeing as it seems to annoy you so much.
-
I guess Hoshoryu was really lucky he didn't have to face him on his tsuna run. That's a really bad head to head to see for a Yokozuna, and only twice was Takayasu ranked higher (and once same rank).
-
I'm not discounting the fact that some people are heavily influenced in their picks by momentum. I'm just quite surprised that it was that much more of a factor to people than career record to date to cause such an imbalance in that direction. If someone told me that the picks for that match were imbalanced and asked which side I thought it went, I would have been wrong.