Sign in to follow this  
Kintamayama

2022 Speedy torikumi awards

Recommended Posts

Shortest average torikumis:

1 . Abi - 5.07 seconds (4.23 when winning, 6.46 when losing)

2. Ounoshou- 5.19 (4.16 when winning, 6.30 losing)

3. Tamawashi - 5.84 5.64 (5.60 winning, 5.68 losing)

4. Daieishou - 5.94 (5.00 winning, 6.96 losing)

5. Sadanoumi 5.98 (5.89 winning, 6.07 losing)

Ichinojou (24.13), Kiribayama (19.09),  Terunofuji (15.70) , Tobizaru (15.05) and Takarafuji (14.86) had the longest torikumis on average. Yes, the oshi vs. yotsu etc., but still..

Edited by Kintamayama
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Kintamayama said:

3. Tamawashi - 5.84 (5.60 winning, 5.68 losing)

I checked the source (nikkan sports) and it's 5.64s, 5.84 isn't mathematically possible from 5.60 and 5.68.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 19/12/2022 at 05:10, Kamitsuumi said:

I checked the source (nikkan sports) and it's 5.64s, 5.84 isn't mathematically possible from 5.60 and 5.68.

202212180000708-w500_0.jpg

I copied from this, and that’s what it says. And it's Nikkan.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Kintamayama said:

202212180000708-w500_0.jpg

I copied from this, and that’s what it says. And it's Nikkan.

And it does say 5.64....?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Seiyashi said:

And it does say 5.64....?

My guess his eyesight is not the best and he thinks that 6 (but not any others somehow) looks like an 8.  It's a major problem in some fonts I find on some banks' credit card statements.  That font shouldn't have that problem, but there's evidence against that idea.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Gurowake said:

My guess his eyesight is not the best and he thinks that 6 (but not any others somehow) looks like an 8.  It's a major problem in some fonts I find on some banks' credit card statements.  That font shouldn't have that problem, but there's evidence against that idea.

Yes, it’s 5.64. I see it now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this